I read this because it'd been a while since I joined in on a goodreads Constant Reader book club discussion. I always enjoy those discussions so much. So much intellect flowing over the wires. I don't regret having read the novel, but it wasn't worth interrupting my read of A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.
Jean Brodie is a captivating teacher who cares a little too much about herself. I couldn't help but love her "liberal" attitude for the time period. Very much a feminist in "her prime." The only other adult female characters are the spinster school mistress who is about as unhappy as an elephant who is being attacked by a pride of lions, and a Catholic mother who has a billion children with a man who sleeps with his students after he paints them nude. So, despite all Miss Brodie's flaws (she's obviously lonely, fooled by the romanticism of the fascists, and a pretty terrible teacher) she definitely feels like the winner.
The story is mostly told from the perspective of one of her students. Who I personally think has a VERY unhealthy infatuation with Miss Brodie. Others in the constant reader group don't see it that way. They think poor Sandy was a victim . . . they obviously don't work with teens all day. Sure, they are impressionable, but her obsession (which I almost view as lust) for Miss Brodie is not so innocent.
I didn't really like the writing. It's humorous at times, and I did enjoy that the narrator was anonymous and omniscient. I just don't think the read is something I'd deem classic, and I'm not sure how it's stuck around so long. I'll have to rent the movie.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Batu Kawa, I love you
This is a book I couldn't have understood without my time spent in Batu Kawa, East Malaysia. Even still, much of the statistical math calculations turned me off to the reading (and I still have no idea what a hedge fund is). And ironically, I recognize that by the world standards many living in the Batu Kawa neighborhood would actually be considered "well-off."
What struck me most, was the idea that as long as people want to be rich -- millions of others will have to be poor. Not just poor; destitute.
It's inevitable, and that made this book very depressing. Yet the globalization gap is so fascinating I just couldn't stop reading (even the chapters about hedge funds which I so clearly did not understand). Economically, the impact we all have on each other is much more pressing than our impact environmentally, even though the two co-exist.
In short, I disapprove of the free market and capitalism more than I did when I set out reading this book. By comparison, before I felt disapproval, after I feel disdain. And still, I feel deflated. The realization that there is no conceivable way to ever educate my fellow country men on the matter to point of real change is overwhelming. Even if that were possible, convincing rulers of developing countries to follow suit is even more unfeasible. A solution is unworkable.
The only hope is to make sure that every human being have healthy drinking water, basic health care, and mere literacy. How can such simple things be so hard for the world to achieve?
Wealth.
What struck me most, was the idea that as long as people want to be rich -- millions of others will have to be poor. Not just poor; destitute.
It's inevitable, and that made this book very depressing. Yet the globalization gap is so fascinating I just couldn't stop reading (even the chapters about hedge funds which I so clearly did not understand). Economically, the impact we all have on each other is much more pressing than our impact environmentally, even though the two co-exist.
In short, I disapprove of the free market and capitalism more than I did when I set out reading this book. By comparison, before I felt disapproval, after I feel disdain. And still, I feel deflated. The realization that there is no conceivable way to ever educate my fellow country men on the matter to point of real change is overwhelming. Even if that were possible, convincing rulers of developing countries to follow suit is even more unfeasible. A solution is unworkable.
The only hope is to make sure that every human being have healthy drinking water, basic health care, and mere literacy. How can such simple things be so hard for the world to achieve?
Wealth.
Travel the Country
I really liked this book. It took me a bit too long to read, never a good sign. But the story was told very "cutely." I loved the protagonists voice. Her grandparents (who she spends the whole book with) are equally adorable. I loved following them as they traveled across the country. The details of the drive were captivating.
I actually didn't love the whole Phoebe story. Even though that was pretty much half the point of the whole story. I just didn't think it really fit as well as it should have. I'm glad Phoebe's family had a happy ending. I probably should have been a little more saddened by Sal's family's story. But as a teacher, I love stories that simply touch on tough topics and depict real life emotions.
I will definitely keep this on my kids' shelf. I see myself being the type of mother that has mandatory summer reading. Won't that be fun! But there are just so many great books out there for our independent readers.
I actually didn't love the whole Phoebe story. Even though that was pretty much half the point of the whole story. I just didn't think it really fit as well as it should have. I'm glad Phoebe's family had a happy ending. I probably should have been a little more saddened by Sal's family's story. But as a teacher, I love stories that simply touch on tough topics and depict real life emotions.
I will definitely keep this on my kids' shelf. I see myself being the type of mother that has mandatory summer reading. Won't that be fun! But there are just so many great books out there for our independent readers.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
He gives us children . . . to dream
Fabulous idea to end the school year with a Play. The kids loved it. I had to have a few boys play Mama each week and it was a blast, my favorite part.
The story line is pretty good. I'm shocked at how many versions there are. How many times producers changed her work, how many times she changed her work. I just can't really see that being productive to something you (and the world) considers such a masterpiece. I guess the world of performance is a different one.
Poor Walter, I really feel for him. Donovan played the most convincing Walter -- cruel, animal like, pathetic, and decent. When watching the 1963 movie you really see how crucial Ruth is to the plot line. I like her role. And Mama, how can you not love Mama while all the while wishing she'd just stop meddlin with everyone else. She is so well intentioned, but you can't help but notice that if she'd butt out and let her children lead their own lives every problem would just go away. New ones would arrive of course, probably worse ones. But at least they'd be problems the characters created on their own.
Asagai is adorable, but what I want is the sequel that talks about how shocked and disappointed she was with her move to Africa. At least, that is my understanding of that whole movement to return to the homeland during the 60s. That novel truly would be interesting.
The story line is pretty good. I'm shocked at how many versions there are. How many times producers changed her work, how many times she changed her work. I just can't really see that being productive to something you (and the world) considers such a masterpiece. I guess the world of performance is a different one.
Poor Walter, I really feel for him. Donovan played the most convincing Walter -- cruel, animal like, pathetic, and decent. When watching the 1963 movie you really see how crucial Ruth is to the plot line. I like her role. And Mama, how can you not love Mama while all the while wishing she'd just stop meddlin with everyone else. She is so well intentioned, but you can't help but notice that if she'd butt out and let her children lead their own lives every problem would just go away. New ones would arrive of course, probably worse ones. But at least they'd be problems the characters created on their own.
Asagai is adorable, but what I want is the sequel that talks about how shocked and disappointed she was with her move to Africa. At least, that is my understanding of that whole movement to return to the homeland during the 60s. That novel truly would be interesting.
Purposeful blood?!?!
I'd say I'm surprised I got through this, considering the title -- but I had to read about a teen at "sick" minds. I'd also say I'm surprised how long this took to get through -- but A Walk Two Moons is taking me thrice as long.
I first started reading this back in 2008 or 09. I would get all down and then walk over to Barnes and Noble for a quick read. It really did always make me feel a little better. Suddenly though, I had no need to make these visits so I asked for it on goodreads swap.
I really like Patricia McCormick. You can tell she does a lot of research before she writes her novels. She always explores the most complex of teen girl issues. I wouldn't want my daughter to red them until she was old enough to handle the truth. But that last word is the reason I would want her to read it, truth. McCormick really has a way of telling the world the truth about things so many of us prefer not to talk about.
I first started reading this back in 2008 or 09. I would get all down and then walk over to Barnes and Noble for a quick read. It really did always make me feel a little better. Suddenly though, I had no need to make these visits so I asked for it on goodreads swap.
I really like Patricia McCormick. You can tell she does a lot of research before she writes her novels. She always explores the most complex of teen girl issues. I wouldn't want my daughter to red them until she was old enough to handle the truth. But that last word is the reason I would want her to read it, truth. McCormick really has a way of telling the world the truth about things so many of us prefer not to talk about.
The Night is darker, and brighter, each time.
I love teaching this novel. It's been a few months since I read it. I'm glad I read it with the other two parts of his trilogy. It is definitely the best of the three. So much emotion packed into so few words.
If you have not read this, you must. It is hands down the BEST holocaust work you will ever come across. I don't get why Anne Frank is so popular, this is the real thing. All that fiction coming out now . . . bleh . . . this is the real thing.
His writing is so fascinating. It's at it's best in this novel. His struggle with God, his father, the physical need to survive . . . all are so amazing. The themes in this novel only get better with each read. This last one made read #4 for me (plus the fact that I've read it 5 times -- for each class -- on read #4 and 3 times -- for each class -- for read #3. Pretty much, I love it. Love reading it; love teaching it.
If you have not read this, you must. It is hands down the BEST holocaust work you will ever come across. I don't get why Anne Frank is so popular, this is the real thing. All that fiction coming out now . . . bleh . . . this is the real thing.
His writing is so fascinating. It's at it's best in this novel. His struggle with God, his father, the physical need to survive . . . all are so amazing. The themes in this novel only get better with each read. This last one made read #4 for me (plus the fact that I've read it 5 times -- for each class -- on read #4 and 3 times -- for each class -- for read #3. Pretty much, I love it. Love reading it; love teaching it.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Oh Gerogie
Orwell, Orwell, I love Orwell. What man is able to make a joke out of such a horrid thing? But that's what war is, it's man's big joke to man. Such a joke.
You can't read his account and ever think war is noble or necessary. And yet, he never withdraws. He never decides to go back to England and live the good life (and wait for WWII to arrive). Which just goes to prove war is noble and is needed. How can you change the world without killing a fascist?
I didn't get the politics, at all! But I loved the war story accounts. Genius mind, Orwell truly had a genius mind. The world will never be a good place, until guys like him decide to actually become politicians. But that will never work. So human beings will continue to misbehave and the world will continue to fall apart. Even Orwell himself knew that was the case. He stood by his political views, even when he proved them impossible.
You can't read his account and ever think war is noble or necessary. And yet, he never withdraws. He never decides to go back to England and live the good life (and wait for WWII to arrive). Which just goes to prove war is noble and is needed. How can you change the world without killing a fascist?
I didn't get the politics, at all! But I loved the war story accounts. Genius mind, Orwell truly had a genius mind. The world will never be a good place, until guys like him decide to actually become politicians. But that will never work. So human beings will continue to misbehave and the world will continue to fall apart. Even Orwell himself knew that was the case. He stood by his political views, even when he proved them impossible.
It's been so long
I've only read one YA novel since Breaking Dawn last year. I think that says something about that series. Anyway, it's nice to finally be back into a genre I love. This was a good one to break me back in. The whole communist movement in China truly fascinates me. I feel like this is a good introductory course for teens. I would definitely want my child to read it, I'd say at about 6th grade.
Basically, Ying watches as her country destroys the brilliance her parents have worked so hard to obtain. That is what is so fascinating to me. How can a country purposefully attack all the educated members of society? Do you not see how self destructive that is? Making people equal isn't about making the upper class lower, it's about bringing the lower classes up. Seriously, Mao was intentionally destroying a country of 1 billion people. And the rest of the world just sat back and ignored it.
Fascinating.
Basically, Ying watches as her country destroys the brilliance her parents have worked so hard to obtain. That is what is so fascinating to me. How can a country purposefully attack all the educated members of society? Do you not see how self destructive that is? Making people equal isn't about making the upper class lower, it's about bringing the lower classes up. Seriously, Mao was intentionally destroying a country of 1 billion people. And the rest of the world just sat back and ignored it.
Fascinating.
So popular right now
Holocaust fiction seems to be the guaranteed sale right now. Apparently though, Abe Lincoln is the most written about subject in the world. Pretty interesting, I'd have guessed WWII. But I guess that's just my reading trend.
So this one, I wouldn't recommend it . . . unless you read and were comfortable with A Thousand Splendid Suns. It is similar in graphic content. Which makes sense if you think about it. Both women basically had to place their hands in the lives of gross military leaders. So the icky sex stuff makes sense. I just wish she hadn't been so detailed.
The story line is really good though. I particularly liked the ending. I liked the idea that the main character (whose name has already escaped me two weeks later) Anna! It's Anna, I like that she didn't want to take credit for those she saved, since she'd lived her whole life suffering over the ones she couldn't save. I don't know, I'm not making it sound right, but it just made sense that if she refused for 40 years to talk about the bad stuff, she'd also refuse to talk about the good when faced with it. Almost like refusing to take credit for the good she did was a way to pay penance for the bad. I don't know, I thought that was an interesting concept.
I have to wonder how many people there are in this world who really have no idea who they really are. I'd imagine quite a few. The common theme I find in all the contemporary WWII stuff is simply that, that people really have no idea who they are, because their parents worked so hard (for good or bad) to cover it up and avoid ever having to talk about it.
So this one, I wouldn't recommend it . . . unless you read and were comfortable with A Thousand Splendid Suns. It is similar in graphic content. Which makes sense if you think about it. Both women basically had to place their hands in the lives of gross military leaders. So the icky sex stuff makes sense. I just wish she hadn't been so detailed.
The story line is really good though. I particularly liked the ending. I liked the idea that the main character (whose name has already escaped me two weeks later) Anna! It's Anna, I like that she didn't want to take credit for those she saved, since she'd lived her whole life suffering over the ones she couldn't save. I don't know, I'm not making it sound right, but it just made sense that if she refused for 40 years to talk about the bad stuff, she'd also refuse to talk about the good when faced with it. Almost like refusing to take credit for the good she did was a way to pay penance for the bad. I don't know, I thought that was an interesting concept.
I have to wonder how many people there are in this world who really have no idea who they really are. I'd imagine quite a few. The common theme I find in all the contemporary WWII stuff is simply that, that people really have no idea who they are, because their parents worked so hard (for good or bad) to cover it up and avoid ever having to talk about it.
A true classic
Ummm, such a good one. I seriously love it more and more each time I read it. I don't even think this book ever has to compete to make it onto top 50 lists. Romantically timeless, wonderfully witty writing: Jane Austen was brilliant. Anyone who hasn't read this is seriously missing out. There is a reason hundreds of movies and books have been written based on this story.
Darcy really is such a dream. Elizabeth gets a little more annoying with each read, but she'll never reach the pains of Emma. Ughhhh, I think I need to try Sense and Sensibility or Mansfield Park. I don't doubt Austen deserves two slots on my final list, but Emma will not be the one to do it.
Anyway, I should say more about this one, but I really can't. It's perfect. In all ways it is perfect. That's all that can be said. It only took me about three sittings in less than a week to get through this. Such a perfect little pleasure.
Darcy really is such a dream. Elizabeth gets a little more annoying with each read, but she'll never reach the pains of Emma. Ughhhh, I think I need to try Sense and Sensibility or Mansfield Park. I don't doubt Austen deserves two slots on my final list, but Emma will not be the one to do it.
Anyway, I should say more about this one, but I really can't. It's perfect. In all ways it is perfect. That's all that can be said. It only took me about three sittings in less than a week to get through this. Such a perfect little pleasure.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Life is a farm
I love love love teaching this. All my students got into this. Even the ones with the lowest reading level. It isn't my personal favorite, but as far as teaching goes, I think I would dub it fav.
This book brings up the richest discussion topics. Students become so invested in the characters I think they forget they are animals. Which, is part of the brilliant point. I can really say with confidence, that I think Orwell is one of the greatest writers of all time. I hate to say he, Dickens, and Tolstoy are the top three (all white, all male, pretty lame), but that's truly how I feel.
The most striking part, when Pilkington congratulates Napoleon for having his lowest animals work the hardest and receive the least amount of food. Sweet Miko pointed out that this political theory is how the good ol USofA was built. We are a nation built on that exact same concept.
Pigs.
This book brings up the richest discussion topics. Students become so invested in the characters I think they forget they are animals. Which, is part of the brilliant point. I can really say with confidence, that I think Orwell is one of the greatest writers of all time. I hate to say he, Dickens, and Tolstoy are the top three (all white, all male, pretty lame), but that's truly how I feel.
The most striking part, when Pilkington congratulates Napoleon for having his lowest animals work the hardest and receive the least amount of food. Sweet Miko pointed out that this political theory is how the good ol USofA was built. We are a nation built on that exact same concept.
Pigs.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
End of the Game
Ender's Game took me way to long to get through. I started it this summer by the pool, and just finished it at the new year. I just didn't see anything valuable or exciting at the beginning, but once I got to about page 70 I was at least curious to know how it ended.
Why though?
1st - I knew Ender would some how win
2nd - I figured the racism wouldn't let up and it was super annoying me
3rd - I don't really like Sci Fi
4th - I hear Card is a homosexual hater, go figure since his book talks about naked boys every ten pages. Really, I'd guess he was gay if I didn't know better. So the homophobia totally makes sense.
There is a religious plug, but it connects in no way to the LDS Church. I knew a boy who served in Card's ward while on a mission and he said he was "disappointed."
I'd imagine Card is a weirdo, super conservative, recluse. I wish he'd go back and take out the racism (as it adds nothing to the book) and fix the typos and TERRIBLE grammar. And as others say, he spends a ton of time on the middle portion of the story and not enough on the ending. Just felt a little backwards. Plus, the ending ending isn't really needed at all. I felt very much like he was just setting up the story for a series. Which is lame.
Okay, enough complaining. I still manage to give it a couple stars. It wasn't like I wish I'd never read it, I'd just never read it again, nor will I ever recommend it to someone (or tell my friends he is LDS).
Why though?
1st - I knew Ender would some how win
2nd - I figured the racism wouldn't let up and it was super annoying me
3rd - I don't really like Sci Fi
4th - I hear Card is a homosexual hater, go figure since his book talks about naked boys every ten pages. Really, I'd guess he was gay if I didn't know better. So the homophobia totally makes sense.
There is a religious plug, but it connects in no way to the LDS Church. I knew a boy who served in Card's ward while on a mission and he said he was "disappointed."
I'd imagine Card is a weirdo, super conservative, recluse. I wish he'd go back and take out the racism (as it adds nothing to the book) and fix the typos and TERRIBLE grammar. And as others say, he spends a ton of time on the middle portion of the story and not enough on the ending. Just felt a little backwards. Plus, the ending ending isn't really needed at all. I felt very much like he was just setting up the story for a series. Which is lame.
Okay, enough complaining. I still manage to give it a couple stars. It wasn't like I wish I'd never read it, I'd just never read it again, nor will I ever recommend it to someone (or tell my friends he is LDS).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)