I liked the story theme that history is forgotten, almost even erased. I still think the banana rebellion was a bit of a stretch. There's no way a town wouldn't notice the murder of 3,000 people. But I guess the point is that if a government is evil enough they can cover it up. Pretty amazing.
Overall, the book was a bit graphic for me. And I'm not excited to read his next one. But I do see why this was on my list of 50 greatest books. The sentences are flawless, even in translation. The story is compelling, even if it feels a bit rushed. I'd never want to teach this, not even in AP. I just felt like there was so much there that I didn't understand. Thank you sparknotes for helping me get through it.
Now about the title of this post. I do think this book was trying to prove something about the isolation of a small village, and I didn't really get what. Some people left the village and came back so it wasn't all that terribly isolated. Maybe it was trying to prove the crab bucket theory. Like I said, I'm just not sure I understood everything that was going on in this novel.
No comments:
Post a Comment